Big dealers in big cities are probably known to be well-armed and ready to repel boarders (the classic fortified crackhouse), and present a hard target to anything short of a SWAT team, but these little soft-target dealers are just asking to be hit by any two-bit group of punks. They should find a safer line of work when they get out of the can. Maybe 3-5, back out in 18 months?
Here's an idea: It doesn't have revenue-enhancement potential, but the city could write a LB which would mandate that juveniles age 12 and higher that are charged with a Part I crime be prosecuted in adult court for those offenses, then pop it on a legislator's desk gift-wrapped, with a bow on it, at the start of the next session. These are adult crimes, and those who commit them should be treated as such.
I realize that you're not dealing with the brightest bulbs but calling the police because drugs got stolen from you? Come on people!! The stupidity of people never ceases to amaze me. I wonder if she'll try to collect damages from her homeowners insurance too?
This is a serious crime involving firearms, juveniles and a home invasion. Yet the incident is more properly related to drug prohibition than drug pharmacology. The fact that marihuana is illegal creates a lucrative black market for dealers, which in turn makes them attractive targets for home invasions. A legal and regulated market for marihuana would eliminate these home invasions. These incidents consume significant police and court resources. Marihuana is not a benign drug but its effects on the human body pale in comparison to the overall consequences of drug prohibition.
This blog is one of my favorites because Chief Casady is usually open to new laws designed to reduce crime. Yet the topic of drug legalization & regulation has never been discussed as far as I am aware. Given this latest home invasion - one of many - it may be worth considering.
Please note that I'm not suggesting that police ignore laws regarding possession, trafficking etc. Police officers have a duty to enforce the laws that are on the books. Nor am I pro drug use. This is a general comment in support of changing drug laws that are ineffective and harmful.
David Bratzer Member of LEAP Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Victoria, B.C.
I'd sooner see alcohol prohibition than drug legalization. Then we could tell the doper crowd that we are being consistent, just not in the way that they hoped. Ask the Chief what happened to their daily arrest numbers during prohibition (no he's not quite that old, but he does have access to the records).
Legalizing alcohol by repealing prohibition didn't decrease the other crimes that spring from the use of and addiction to that substance, nor would legalizing drugs decrease the other crimes that spring from the use of and addiction (including psychological) to those substances either.
Isn't 'marihuana' supposed to be spelled with a 'j', as in 'marijuana'? After all, they don't call it 'mary hane'.
According to the CDC, marijuana is associated with many of the same lung diseases cigarette smoking causes...and health costs from tobacco use are already out of control. Should we really compound the problem by adding marijuana to the mix?
The idea that we should just legalize it and tax it is only going to help 2 groups of people...potheads and big tobacco. Think about it...who would be better suited to start growing and distributing MJ than the tobacco industry?
What a coincidence! Let me phrase it this way: A9-022163, the usual home invasion question.
I mean, if somebody wanted lots of jeans, I'd think that they'd instead just burgle Fort Western and get 115 pairs, not do a HIR on a pad in that part of town for a mere 15. Also, if you had a lot of cash, you probably wouldn't live in that area, would you.
The Magic 8-ball says this one is fishy and rolling my 100-sided die, it comes up on...74. Why on earth would that be? ;^)
NAME OUR NEXT EVENT ON APRIL 11TH @ SIDEWINDERS 17TH & O IN LINCOLN! To members of Dem Pretty Boiz Productions Dem Pretty Boiz
Today at 10:37am ReplyNAME OUR NEXT EVENT
In the tradition of classic DPB events we are doing the ULTIMATE PARTY CONTEST!!
We want YOU to name our event on April 11th @ Sidewinders in Lincoln! Starting today we are asking you to post your craziest, most creative party concepts to us via Myspace, Facebook, Email, and or text message. We will be posting these ideas on the afor mentioned sites so that everyone can see who is competing for the ultimate prize.....THE DOOR!
Thats right YOU NAME THE PARTY, YOU GET THE DOOR PROCEDES! Its that simple. The contest starts today and the winner's party idea will be announced on Sunday, March 29th on Myspace and Facebook sites. Below are the instructions:
FACEBOOK: Post party ideas on DEM PRETTY BOIZ MAIN PAGE OR EVENT PAGE. In order to post on the event page you may have to accept the invite for the party. If you did not receive an invite to event mark yourself as ATTENDING.
MYSPACE: Post party themes on DEM PRETTY BOIZ MYSPACE PAGE (myspace.com/demprettyboiz402) in the comments section or send message with party idea.
EMAIL: Email party ideas to: demprettyboiz@hotmail.com
So start sending us your ideas and good luck on becoming Nebraska's next BIG PROMOTER! We will make sure everyone is updated on the selection process.
Grundle King - I'm from Canada, where most Canadians do spell it with a 'j'. However, our Controlled Drugs and Substances Act spells it with an 'h' and so I am in the habit of spelling it that way on reports.
The idea behind regulating and controlling drugs is not that they are benign substances. The idea, in fact, is that they are so harmful the government should have full control of them. Right now the government has no control. Because these substances are illegal, it is the criminal drug dealers get to decide where to sell them, at what price, at what purity, to which age groups, at whatever location they want (in or beside schools etc).
Legalizing and regulating drugs would not automatically mean they get sold in the same manner as tobacco. For a range of regulatory options please see the white paper "After the War on Drugs - Options for Control" at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation web site.
That said, tobacco is an amazing success story for those who are against drug prohibition. Possession of tobacco is legal in the United States. But through regulation and education, smoking has declined from 42.4% of adults 1965 to 20.8% nowadays (source: Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, National Health Information Surveys).
Anon at 5:32am - I would be interested in hearing about those daily arrest stats during alcohol prohibition... it is always good to remain open minded to new info. You are correct in stating there are still serious health and crime problems that still occur due to alcohol abuse. But the owners of bars and liquor stores no longer shoot each other in the streets when they have a business disagreement, which is what used to happen before the 21st amendment. Now they settle their disputes in civil court.
In these difficult financial times, it is important for the public to hear that regulating and controlling drugs would reduce crime, generate new tax revenues and launch an economic war against organized crime.
David Bratzer Member of LEAP Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Victoria, B.C.
Here's a relevant question, David: Being a member of "Law Enforcement Against Prohibition", are you, or have you ever been, a sworn member of any law enforcement agency (and if so, which agency and what rank do/did you hold), or are you like most members of "Union of Concerned Scientists" - not scientists at all.
I ask, because some advocacy organizations names are a little misleading, and in reality just a fig leaf of credibility. In fact, members of LEAP are not required to be current or former law enforcement officers at all, and most of your members have never been sworn law enforcement, isn't that correct?
Hmm, when I roll the 100-sided die on A9-022369, it also comes up a 74. I've got to find out the significance of that number someday. In any event, since they just got cash (at least that's all that was reported by the victim), I wonder why they didn't rob the check cashing place instead? It's just up the street a ways. There's a bank right up the block too, and they've probably got cash there.
Let's see, what kind of loot could be in a run-down rental house that would attract armed robbers...
Anon at 10:07pm - Yes I am a serving police officer in British Columbia. My bio is on the LEAP web site. I am a constable and I work in patrol, hoping to go to K9 someday. I have three years on the job and before that I was a jailer in city cells for two years. Of course, my opinions are my own and they don't represent my department.
Anyone can volunteer with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. There are a lot of dedicated civilians who contribute behind the scenes because they are passionate about changing drug policy.. But in order to give interviews, make presentations, publish op-ed pieces etc, you need to be a current or former member of law enforcement.
Well then, you might be able to answer this: How many current/former sworn LE members does LEAP have, and how many members who have never been sworn LE?
I was yahoo searching my company and found that someone would post one of my events as "crime prevention" in the city of Lincoln on this web site. I cannot recall the last time that any of Dem Pretty Boiz events have had any problems in the city of Lincoln or anywhere else in the WORLD. If any one has any questions regarding the company or would wish to contact me please do on that same FACEBOOK page. I mean for God sake's they attached my name to this post on the chief of police's web site. lol. I have enough problems as it is with police appearing at venues I work with trying to scare the owners into not doing business with us. Its totally unfair. Keep that stuff on O St. Thats where the real problems are. We are not doing events to purposely cause trouble. Thanks.
Big dealers in big cities are probably known to be well-armed and ready to repel boarders (the classic fortified crackhouse), and present a hard target to anything short of a SWAT team, but these little soft-target dealers are just asking to be hit by any two-bit group of punks. They should find a safer line of work when they get out of the can. Maybe 3-5, back out in 18 months?
ReplyDeleteFor the robbery defendants, I'd say that would be a good guess on the two that are adults, but the other two are juveniles.
ReplyDeleteVery impressed by the officer who thought to try her birthdate!
ReplyDeleteThat would be Officer Matisha Nadgwick.
ReplyDeleteHere's an idea: It doesn't have revenue-enhancement potential, but the city could write a LB which would mandate that juveniles age 12 and higher that are charged with a Part I crime be prosecuted in adult court for those offenses, then pop it on a legislator's desk gift-wrapped, with a bow on it, at the start of the next session. These are adult crimes, and those who commit them should be treated as such.
ReplyDeleteI realize that you're not dealing with the brightest bulbs but calling the police because drugs got stolen from you? Come on people!! The stupidity of people never ceases to amaze me. I wonder if she'll try to collect damages from her homeowners insurance too?
ReplyDeleteThis is a serious crime involving firearms, juveniles and a home invasion. Yet the incident is more properly related to drug prohibition than drug pharmacology. The fact that marihuana is illegal creates a lucrative black market for dealers, which in turn makes them attractive targets for home invasions. A legal and regulated market for marihuana would eliminate these home invasions. These incidents consume significant police and court resources. Marihuana is not a benign drug but its effects on the human body pale in comparison to the overall consequences of drug prohibition.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is one of my favorites because Chief Casady is usually open to new laws designed to reduce crime. Yet the topic of drug legalization & regulation has never been discussed as far as I am aware. Given this latest home invasion - one of many - it may be worth considering.
Please note that I'm not suggesting that police ignore laws regarding possession, trafficking etc. Police officers have a duty to enforce the laws that are on the books. Nor am I pro drug use. This is a general comment in support of changing drug laws that are ineffective and harmful.
David Bratzer
Member of LEAP
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Victoria, B.C.
I'd sooner see alcohol prohibition than drug legalization. Then we could tell the doper crowd that we are being consistent, just not in the way that they hoped. Ask the Chief what happened to their daily arrest numbers during prohibition (no he's not quite that old, but he does have access to the records).
ReplyDeleteLegalizing alcohol by repealing prohibition didn't decrease the other crimes that spring from the use of and addiction to that substance, nor would legalizing drugs decrease the other crimes that spring from the use of and addiction (including psychological) to those substances either.
Isn't 'marihuana' supposed to be spelled with a 'j', as in 'marijuana'? After all, they don't call it 'mary hane'.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the CDC, marijuana is associated with many of the same lung diseases cigarette smoking causes...and health costs from tobacco use are already out of control. Should we really compound the problem by adding marijuana to the mix?
The idea that we should just legalize it and tax it is only going to help 2 groups of people...potheads and big tobacco. Think about it...who would be better suited to start growing and distributing MJ than the tobacco industry?
What a coincidence! Let me phrase it this way: A9-022163, the usual home invasion question.
ReplyDeleteI mean, if somebody wanted lots of jeans, I'd think that they'd instead just burgle Fort Western and get 115 pairs, not do a HIR on a pad in that part of town for a mere 15. Also, if you had a lot of cash, you probably wouldn't live in that area, would you.
The Magic 8-ball says this one is fishy and rolling my 100-sided die, it comes up on...74. Why on earth would that be? ;^)
HERE IS SOME CRIME PREVENTION FOR YOU..
ReplyDeleteFOUND THIS ON FACEBOOK.
APRIL 11TH.
NAME OUR NEXT EVENT ON APRIL 11TH @ SIDEWINDERS 17TH & O IN LINCOLN!
To members of Dem Pretty Boiz Productions
Dem Pretty Boiz
Today at 10:37am
ReplyNAME OUR NEXT EVENT
In the tradition of classic DPB events we are doing the ULTIMATE PARTY CONTEST!!
We want YOU to name our event on April 11th @ Sidewinders in Lincoln! Starting today we are asking you to post your craziest, most creative party concepts to us via Myspace, Facebook, Email, and or text message. We will be posting these ideas on the afor mentioned sites so that everyone can see who is competing for the ultimate prize.....THE DOOR!
Thats right YOU NAME THE PARTY, YOU GET THE DOOR PROCEDES! Its that simple. The contest starts today and the winner's party idea will be announced on Sunday, March 29th on Myspace and Facebook sites. Below are the instructions:
FACEBOOK:
Post party ideas on DEM PRETTY BOIZ MAIN PAGE OR EVENT PAGE. In order to post on the event page you may have to accept the invite for the party. If you did not receive an invite to event mark yourself as ATTENDING.
MYSPACE:
Post party themes on DEM PRETTY BOIZ MYSPACE PAGE (myspace.com/demprettyboiz402) in the comments section or send message with party idea.
EMAIL:
Email party ideas to: demprettyboiz@hotmail.com
So start sending us your ideas and good luck on becoming Nebraska's next BIG PROMOTER! We will make sure everyone is updated on the selection process.
Bishop
Dem Pretty Boiz Productions & Family
Grundle King - I'm from Canada, where most Canadians do spell it with a 'j'. However, our Controlled Drugs and Substances Act spells it with an 'h' and so I am in the habit of spelling it that way on reports.
ReplyDeleteThe idea behind regulating and controlling drugs is not that they are benign substances. The idea, in fact, is that they are so harmful the government should have full control of them. Right now the government has no control. Because these substances are illegal, it is the criminal drug dealers get to decide where to sell them, at what price, at what purity, to which age groups, at whatever location they want (in or beside schools etc).
Legalizing and regulating drugs would not automatically mean they get sold in the same manner as tobacco. For a range of regulatory options please see the white paper "After the War on Drugs - Options for Control" at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation web site.
That said, tobacco is an amazing success story for those who are against drug prohibition. Possession of tobacco is legal in the United States. But through regulation and education, smoking has declined from 42.4% of adults 1965 to 20.8% nowadays (source: Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, National Health Information Surveys).
Anon at 5:32am - I would be interested in hearing about those daily arrest stats during alcohol prohibition... it is always good to remain open minded to new info. You are correct in stating there are still serious health and crime problems that still occur due to alcohol abuse. But the owners of bars and liquor stores no longer shoot each other in the streets when they have a business disagreement, which is what used to happen before the 21st amendment. Now they settle their disputes in civil court.
In these difficult financial times, it is important for the public to hear that regulating and controlling drugs would reduce crime, generate new tax revenues and launch an economic war against organized crime.
David Bratzer
Member of LEAP
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Victoria, B.C.
I guess if the US legalized gonja there would be something for the hippies to do.
ReplyDeleteWho knows, it might even take care of Lincoln's beaver problem.
Here's a relevant question, David: Being a member of "Law Enforcement Against Prohibition", are you, or have you ever been, a sworn member of any law enforcement agency (and if so, which agency and what rank do/did you hold), or are you like most members of "Union of Concerned Scientists" - not scientists at all.
ReplyDeleteI ask, because some advocacy organizations names are a little misleading, and in reality just a fig leaf of credibility. In fact, members of LEAP are not required to be current or former law enforcement officers at all, and most of your members have never been sworn law enforcement, isn't that correct?
Hmm, when I roll the 100-sided die on A9-022369, it also comes up a 74. I've got to find out the significance of that number someday. In any event, since they just got cash (at least that's all that was reported by the victim), I wonder why they didn't rob the check cashing place instead? It's just up the street a ways. There's a bank right up the block too, and they've probably got cash there.
ReplyDeleteLet's see, what kind of loot could be in a run-down rental house that would attract armed robbers...
Anon at 10:07pm - Yes I am a serving police officer in British Columbia. My bio is on the LEAP web site. I am a constable and I work in patrol, hoping to go to K9 someday. I have three years on the job and before that I was a jailer in city cells for two years. Of course, my opinions are my own and they don't represent my department.
ReplyDeleteAnyone can volunteer with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. There are a lot of dedicated civilians who contribute behind the scenes because they are passionate about changing drug policy.. But in order to give interviews, make presentations, publish op-ed pieces etc, you need to be a current or former member of law enforcement.
Dave
Well then, you might be able to answer this: How many current/former sworn LE members does LEAP have, and how many members who have never been sworn LE?
ReplyDeleteI was yahoo searching my company and found that someone would post one of my events as "crime prevention" in the city of Lincoln on this web site. I cannot recall the last time that any of Dem Pretty Boiz events have had any problems in the city of Lincoln or anywhere else in the WORLD. If any one has any questions regarding the company or would wish to contact me please do on that same FACEBOOK page. I mean for God sake's they attached my name to this post on the chief of police's web site. lol. I have enough problems as it is with police appearing at venues I work with trying to scare the owners into not doing business with us. Its totally unfair. Keep that stuff on O St. Thats where the real problems are. We are not doing events to purposely cause trouble. Thanks.
ReplyDelete3:37-
ReplyDeleteWant me to delete that anonymous comment? Looks to me like it's just a cut 'n paste from your facebook page, but I'd be happy to make it go away.